Posted by: Andrew Brown on: 18 August, 2006
Student politics being what they are I’ve left most of mine behind. The one bit that I’ve always thought sensible was the no platform position for racists.
When I was a student, those further to the left than me argued (and occasionally a bit more than argued) that this should extend to the Conservative Party – who to be fair were winding us lefties up by inviting the apartheid era High Commissioner/Ambassador onto campus. So I’d have thought that parties that take more extreme positions than the early 1990s Conservative Students had and have a history of racist propaganda might raise the same concerns.
Maybe things have moved on across the piece and the far left no longer support a no platform policy. Anyway, a bit disappointing to see Ian Page (Socialist Party councillor for Telegraph Hill) seems to be comfortable to share a television studio with Hizb-ut Tahrir.
If I’ve misunderstood Ian’s position I’ll be happy to correct the impression I’ve been left with.
Further Reading:
Newsnight programme from 2003 – BBC
Hizb ut Tahrir’s different faces - Pickled Politics
Hizb ut Tahrir; Controversy over Anti-Semitism – Wikipedia
Politicalcorrepondent.
These two things are completely different.
If i sign a petition to save a local swimming pool from closure, for example, and a member of the BNP signs the same petition. Does that mean I support the BNP?
I think not.
I don’t agree.
Sharing a platform means exposing and being able, in debate, to show the flaws in an argument of another person/group. Leaving people to do their own publicity leaves them unchallenged.
18 August, 2006 at 11:21 am
Some Tories are also indulging in not dissimilar antics…
http://thedaily.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/tory-councillor-eu-more-dangerous-than-bnp/