Posted by: Andrew Brown on: 28 September, 2006
Gideon Rachman takes a look at politicians who blog and he’s not that impressed:
Political advisers around the world are clearly giving the same advice to their bosses. Blogging is meant to let politicians communicate directly with voters in a folksy style. In practice it makes aspiring statesmen sound like Mr Pooter, the character from Victorian fiction whose Diary of a Nobody was famous for its banality.
I think he’s got a point. It’s okay for me to tell you about my dinner last night, or what book I’ve been reading and to do the pooterish stuff of a million blogs, but do you want that from leading politicians?
Of course it needn’t be that way. I thought the Pensions Reform blog from James Purnell and the DWP was an excellent example of how to take a look at a subject; open, informative, just the right side of chatty and interested in what people had to say.
But if politicians blogs become the internet equivalent of the answer to the “what’s on your i-pod?” that seems to be doing the rounds at the moment I wouldn’t be surprised if Mr Rachman’s friend who said “blogging is over” isn’t right.
Further reading:
Pickled Politics – Gordon Brown needs to embrace blogs
12 October, 2006 at 5:25 pm
I think that this is a big challenge.
Political blogs = very interesting
Politician’s blogs = very boring
What to do?