the state of local politics

As many of you will probably know (or guessed) party politics doesn’t have the same sway as it once might have.  There has been a bit of research which paints a pretty sober picture of just where we are:

  • 3% of Constituency Labour Parties, 20% of Conservative Associations and 40% of Lib Dem Local Parties have fewer than 100 members per constituency. Conservative Associations in the North of England typically have fewer than 50 members per constituency.
  • 34% of Conservative Associations, 50% of Constituency Labour Parties and 73% of Liberal Democrat Local Parties received less than £5,000 in income in 2005 meaning they had less than 7 pence to spend per elector in that year. By contrast, Conservative Associations in Conservative-held constituencies typically received more than £50,000 in 2005.
  • 32% of Conservative Associations, 44% of Liberal Democrat Local Parties and 50% of Constituency Labour Parties distributed less than 1 leaflet per household in the 2005 General Election.
  • At least 67% of the population received no personal contact from any of the three main parties in the 2005 General Election. In solid Labour seats, this figure increased to 82%.

And if you think that its just the mainstream parties that are having a hard time of it then get across to Dave’s blog to take a look at the George Galloway fan club’s diminishing returns.I’m not too bothered about funding issues; its nice when you’ve got enough cash to pay for the things you know you ought to do but its clearly damaging when campaigns cost too much.  So having to run a tight ship isn’t necessarily a bad thing (whether the £50,000 that safe Tory seats have is tight I’ll leave up to you).

But the Unlock Democracy report points out:

Political parties perform important roles without which representative democracy could not exist. They offer alternative policies from which voters choose at elections, organise campaigns to mobilise voters and perhaps most importantly they field candidates for public office. Political parties may be unpopular but there is simply no better alternative model for organising democracy.

Without activists and members nothing happens.

The question is what to do?  I’m sure that Peter has the right idea and that just asking will be enough for some people to join, but perhaps not for others.

I came from a family who talked a lot of politics and the extension of talking about it to trying to do something about it wasn’t that far a step.  I joined my party because I wanted to change the world and recognised that doing that on my own was going to be difficult.  I joined because I hated many of the things that the Conservative Government were doing.   I became active because I didn’t consider that there was an alternative, and I stayed active because of the relationships that developed and the experiences I had.  I put myself forward for election because someone asked me to.

Perhaps you can tell me why you joined your party (if you’re a member) or what might make you consider joining (if you’re not)?

6 Responses to “the state of local politics”

  1. Cor. This is something that’s fascinated me for the past few years, possibly as a result of thinking aloud on my own site (possibly returning to a computer near you soon) for a few years and seeing the responses to it, and learning a lot. We all love to moan, but when it comes to getting involved, well, the armchair’s always a bit easier than leaving the house and doing something.

    I’m not a member of a party, although I’ve been seriously tempted to join one (hmm, nice green colour of this site) from time to time. Indeed, a pal in Another Party was delighted - “at least you’ll get involved in the process”, he said.

    But I’m scared of the horrors that may lie within - would I be the youngest person there? Would I end up being roped into stuff I couldn’t handle? Would I find the whole thing horribly depressing? Would I actually find myself disagreeing with more than I agreed with?

    It’s all about “people like us”, isn’t it? It’s all very well if you come from a political background, but what if you’re coming to it from the outside? I’ve also found a lot of people involved in politics at a local level are, frankly, a bit odd, and the idea of voluntarily spending time with them is as appealling as sticking needles in your eyes. And when elected representatives hide away from their public, when all you hear is the usual bullshit and cut-and-pasted platitudes, or patronising orders from on high, then it’s hardly a shining advert for doing your bit.

    At least when people like yourself stick your head above the parapet, and chew the fat in a manner far removed from the usual party political kindergarten stuff, it makes it all look a bit more interesting, something people might want to get involved with.

  2. Oh yes, the horrors that lie within.

    I tend to think of us - and that’s all the parties - as being a bit like a secular version of the Jehovah’s Witnesses: we come to your house on a Sunday morning and ask you if you “believe in politics” and try to leave a copy of our magazine for you to “read” later.

    Most of the people in political parties are nice as pie, very few of them agree with eachother let alone “the line”, but yes you will be the youngest and (to your own mind at least) sanest for a few years at least.

  3. [...] An interesting debate has started at Bloggers4Labour about why individuals have chosen to join political parties, and the Labour Party in particular. The debate has kicked off in part as a result of some Rowntree Foundation / New Politics work on the issue - more here. [...]

  4. WHY NO MENTION OF IRAQ?

  5. Ian, well noticed! Perhaps if you’ve read other posts I’ve written you’ll have seen I don’t think I’ve mentioned Iraq on this blog once.

  6. [...] touched on this before and of course there are people like Peter who argue that a range of our problems stem from [...]

Leave a Reply